Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 463 days older than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 175 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1154
100%
Multi-Core
3735
69.44960952026776%
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
76.77642980935875%
Multi-Core
5378
100%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
