Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Core i5-5350U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 637 days older than Core i5-5350U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-5350U - 127 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-5350U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
