Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 2136 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 180 vs 178 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Single-Core
866
75.04332755632582%
Multi-Core
2541
68.03212851405623%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
