Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 208 vs 191 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |