Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1205 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 154 vs 152 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6478 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |