Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1695 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 167 vs 152 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |