Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2368 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1610 - 226 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |