Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2786 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 42% better in War Thunder than FX-8120 - 183 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |