Buy on Amazon
$26.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 293 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 80% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $26.99 vs $136.62
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.18 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Pentium G4400 - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
146
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
19%
Price, $
$136.62
19%
FPS Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
