Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 851 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 7% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 141 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $232.12 vs $1499.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i9-9960X - $1.76 vs $10.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 140 vs 165 Watts
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.64/FPS
16.541353383458645%
Price, $
$1499.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
132
93.61702127659575%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
78.95500725689405%
Multi-Core
3898
39.00340204122473%
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |