Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 2426 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6200 - 127 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $42.85 vs $699.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9960X - $0.4 vs $5.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 3 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |