Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 2530 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-6350 - 278 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |