Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 28 days older than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10400F - 207 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2565 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |