Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 2718 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 63% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8300 - 382 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |