Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3012 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $100.0 vs $109.99
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-950 - 185 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-950 - $0.59 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |