Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-950 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-950 is 1239 days older than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-8300 - $100.0 vs $112.02
- Up to 11% better value when playing Rust than FX-8300 - $0.65 vs $0.73 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
