Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $100.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-10320 - $1.1 vs $1.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 13% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-950 - 103 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |