Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 2282 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i7-950 - 271 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $99.9 vs $100.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-950 - $0.37 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
