Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 560 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 202 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $136.62 vs $200.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-8700 - $0.7 vs $0.99 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
196
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |