Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $364
Availability
MSRP in USD: $364
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i7-720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1167 days newer than Core i7-720QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-720QM
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-720QM - 233 vs 229 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-720QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-720QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-720QM | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 12.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
