Buy on Amazon
$50.74
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Core i7-620M - 694 vs 682 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel CPU BX80662G3900 Celeron G3900 2.80Ghz 2M LGA1151 2C/2T Skylake Retail
Buy for $50.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-620M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
