Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-620M vs Pentium G3258

Core i7-620M vs Pentium G3258: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 1607 days newer than Core i7-620M.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M

  • Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 35 vs 53 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258

  • Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-620M - 509 vs 504 FPS
This is a free version of World of Tanks.
World of Tanks

World of Tanks

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-620M Logo
Core i7-620M

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010


FPS

504

99%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Pentium G3258 Logo
Pentium G3258

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014


FPS

509

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.1/FPS

100%

Price, $

$51.36

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)

Buy for $51.36 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 6 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-620M Logo
Core i7-620M

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010

Intel Pentium G3258 Logo
Pentium G3258

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-620M Logo
Core i7-620M

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010


Single-Core

439

71%

Multi-Core

814

75%

Intel Pentium G3258 Logo
Pentium G3258

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

613

100%

Multi-Core

1074

100%

Intel Core i7-620M Logo

Intel Core i7-620M

vs
Intel Pentium G3258 Logo

Intel Pentium G3258

Jan 7th, 2010Release Date
Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i7CollectionPentium
ArrandaleCodenameHaswell
Intel BGA 1288SocketIntel Socket 1150
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
35 W
TDP53 W
32 nmProcess Size
22 nm
20.0xMultiplier
32.0x
HD Graphics (Ironlake)Integrated GraphicsIntel HD (Haswell)
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.