Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 970 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than Core i7-620M - 155 vs 146 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |