Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 637 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 9% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Celeron G1610 - 84 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $37.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 91% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-5820K - $0.48 vs $5.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |