Buy on Amazon
$429.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 637 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 29% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 166 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $37.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 89% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-5820K - $0.29 vs $2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
11.196911196911197%
Price, $
$429.95
8%
FPS Winner
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
129
77.71084337349397%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
36.724137931034484%
Multi-Core
739
13.577071467940474%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
