Buy on Amazon
$197.65
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1096
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1096
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-4940MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1717 days newer than Core i7-4940MX.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4940MX
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 57 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Core i7-4940MX - 210 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4940MX - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-4940MX
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4940MX | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
57 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
