Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4940MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2292 days newer than Core i7-4940MX.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4940MX
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 57 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Core i7-4940MX - 178 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4940MX - 20 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4940MX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
57 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |