Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1513 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 11% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $122.03 vs $136.62
- Up to 8% better value when playing God of War than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.74 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Core i7-3770 - 170 vs 165 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
165
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
92%
Price, $
$136.62
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |