Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $122.03 vs $165.86
- Up to 17% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600KF - $0.64 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Core i7-3770 - 215 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
192
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3788 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
83%
Price, $
$165.86
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3788 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |