Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 2200G - 288 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $130.0 vs $165.86
- Up to 12% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11600KF - $0.51 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
87%
Price, $
$165.86
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
253
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |