Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Remnant II than Core i5-760 - 96 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $100.0 vs $164.89
- Up to 26% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-11600KF - $1.28 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
74%
Price, $
$164.89
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $164.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |