Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2601 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $100.0 vs $109.99
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-760 - 173 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
