Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 420 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2920XM - 167 vs 166 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |