Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1989 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-2600S - 523 vs 508 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $232.12 vs $235.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-2600S - $0.44 vs $0.46 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
508
97.131931166348%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
95.65217391304347%
Price, $
$235
98%
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2449 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
523
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
53.58455882352941%
Multi-Core
1811
46.459722934838375%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |