Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 2167 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 7 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-L16G7 - 253 vs 251 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-L16G7
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Lakefield | Codename | Haswell |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
5 | Cores | 2 |
5 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
7 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
