Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 2118 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 7 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-L16G7 - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 20 vs 5 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-L16G7
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Lakefield | Codename | Haswell |
| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 5 | Cores | 10 |
| 5 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
7 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
