Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1093 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 7 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than Core i5-L16G7 - 151 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 64 vs 5 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-L16G7
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Lakefield | Codename | Naples |
| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 5 | Cores | 32 |
| 5 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
7 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
