Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 2118 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 7 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i5-L16G7 - 265 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 8 vs 5 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-L16G7
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Lakefield | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 5 | Cores | 8 |
| 5 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
7 W | TDP | 135 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
