Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 2118 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 7 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 22% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-L16G7 - 127 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 16 vs 5 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-L16G7
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Lakefield | Codename | Haswell |
| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 5 | Cores | 8 |
| 5 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
7 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
