Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 1987 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than FX-8320 - 269 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $95.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-8400T - $0.38 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
73.07692307692307%
Price, $
$139
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7570 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
93.68029739776952%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |