Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 386 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-8400T - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $80.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-8400T - $0.66 vs $1.18 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
118
97.52066115702479%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
55.93220338983051%
Price, $
$139
57%
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7521 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |