Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1079 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $139.0 vs $150.0
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 79% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-8400T - 77 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 40% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-8400T - $1.95 vs $3.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 12 vs 6 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
43
55.84415584415584%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
60.371517027863774%
Price, $
$139
100%
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5603 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5606 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
50.045537340619305%
Multi-Core
3884
44.607786838176175%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |