Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8400T - 590 vs 520 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $136.49 vs $139.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8400T - $0.23 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
520
88.13559322033898%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
85.18518518518519%
Price, $
$139
98%
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5621 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
590
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $136.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5623 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
66.28468033775633%
Multi-Core
3884
56.80023398654578%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |