Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $143.7 vs $165.86
- Up to 7% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600KF - $0.79 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-10600K - 194 vs 181 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2377 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
92%
Price, $
$165.86
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2376 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |