Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 840 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $57.99 vs $230.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-7700K - $0.33 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Core i3-9100F - 190 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |