Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $56.99 vs $209.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-14400F - $0.1 vs $0.31 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-9100F - 680 vs 554 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
554
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
680
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
32%
Price, $
$209.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |