Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $56.99 vs $242.17
- Up to 74% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-13600KF - $0.32 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than Core i3-9100F - 199 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
177
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
26%
Price, $
$242.17
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |