Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 461 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $83.78 vs $139.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400T - $0.78 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
60.46511627906976%
Price, $
$139
60%
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6907 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
95.72338489535942%
Multi-Core
3013
77.57466529351184%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |