Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 597 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - 121 vs 118 FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $52.46 vs $139.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-8400T - $0.44 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
118
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |