Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400T is 1987 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 87% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8300 - 43 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 30% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8300 - $3.23 vs $4.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $106.06 vs $139.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
76%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7437 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
53.48837209302325%
Value, $/FPS
$4.61/FPS
70.06507592190889%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |