Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $64.31 vs $188.95
- Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.36 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7500T - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
181
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
34%
Price, $
$188.95
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |